![]() ![]() ![]() RAD capabilities that you are used to.What technology stack to pick? One that offers: Be sure to allocate enough time for this and talk to other companies that have gone this route. Scenario 2: Data synchronization (connecting to legacy databases) often sounds like a simple task, but once you get to the error-handling part, things get complicated really quickly. Migrating data is typically not a huge deal, though you will probably have to normalize it and make changes to your structure. For example, if you have to go to a full Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) model, you probably have no other option. Scenario 1: Data migration (moving to a SQL backend) only applies if you are looking at a total rewrite. How should you handle data migration and data synchronization for a web portal or mobile app? Web applications we see most often are external customer (supplier-facing) portals, such as order tracking, changes, delivery, and product inventory levels.Typically, they have 10 screens or less, and deliver immediate value to your customers/stakeholders. The most successful mobile apps we see are sales and logistics related, often with mapping/route integration, barcode scanning, pictures and signatures.If possible, try to find a module, capability, maybe a web portal or mobile app that can bring you net new business or value.If you have a large business application, here are our recommendations based on experience with our FileMaker Pro customers: You’ve decided you want to move your application into the 2020s, with functionality for the Cloud, web browsers and mobile. Apple continues to invest in the platform and is, at the time of publication, still being sold in Apple stores.APIs now exist, allowing FileMaker Pro to interface with external platforms and applications.Support for SQL has been steadily getting better over the years (although synching and such is still an issue).We’re happy to report that there is good news, such as: This leads us to ask: Is there any good news for ISVs and enterprises with larger FileMaker-based business applications? Support for mobile and tablets was gaining traction, but was limited to Apple device support and apparently lags behind nowĪnd yet FileMaker continues to have a following of devoted developers (you know who you are) for software companies.Its web/browser capabilities are weak and have failed to evolve further.Cloud deployment (without virtualization) is not viable.Scalability for large/complex applications remains an issue.When you look at the future forecast of FileMaker Pro, you have to consider these limitations: So where is FileMaker right now, and does the future hold for this still-popular tool? At the same time, we have to admit, we admired the rapid application development (RAD) or “low-code” or “no-code” capabilities of tools like FileMaker, FoxPro, Delphi and others. FileMaker also lacked SQL support and its scripting (business logic) was limited, creating the need for constant workarounds. To some extent, Servoy was born out of frustration over legacy tools like FileMaker (also known as Claris FileMaker, an Apple product), which did not support things like Cloud-based web browsers, connectivity to external apps and mobile devices. FileMaker Pro: Do You Want the Good News or the Bad News? ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |